CFP last date
03 June 2024
Reseach Article

A New Framework for Sentiment Analysis with Six-Tuples

by Debanjan Banerjee, Bikromadittya Mondal, Sarit Chakraborty
Communications on Applied Electronics
Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA
Volume 2 - Number 9
Year of Publication: 2015
Authors: Debanjan Banerjee, Bikromadittya Mondal, Sarit Chakraborty

Debanjan Banerjee, Bikromadittya Mondal, Sarit Chakraborty . A New Framework for Sentiment Analysis with Six-Tuples. Communications on Applied Electronics. 2, 9 ( September 2015), 25-29. DOI=10.5120/cae2015651852

@article{ 10.5120/cae2015651852,
author = { Debanjan Banerjee, Bikromadittya Mondal, Sarit Chakraborty },
title = { A New Framework for Sentiment Analysis with Six-Tuples },
journal = { Communications on Applied Electronics },
issue_date = { September 2015 },
volume = { 2 },
number = { 9 },
month = { September },
year = { 2015 },
issn = { 2394-4714 },
pages = { 25-29 },
numpages = {9},
url = { },
doi = { 10.5120/cae2015651852 },
publisher = {Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA},
address = {New York, USA}
%0 Journal Article
%1 2023-09-04T19:40:53.707742+05:30
%A Debanjan Banerjee
%A Bikromadittya Mondal
%A Sarit Chakraborty
%T A New Framework for Sentiment Analysis with Six-Tuples
%J Communications on Applied Electronics
%@ 2394-4714
%V 2
%N 9
%P 25-29
%D 2015
%I Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA

Text analytics is one of the growing fields of interest from the scientific and the business communities in recent times.In this paper a new framework is introduced which consists of six elements for presenting a structured and organized form of describing any opinionated sentiment. The basic elements of this frameworkare opinion holder, an entity which is the intended target of the opinion, time of the expressed opinion, sentiment of the opinion, aspect or attribute of the opinion and representation of the opinion. This framework has been constructed keeping in mind the importance of the influence an opinion can inflict in the minds of those to whom the opinion is expressed by the opinion maker. The framework has been assumed from the perspective of the potential influence an opinion can have on the receivers of the opinion. The proposed framework is more improved than other existing works done so far.

  1. Liu, Bing, “Sentiment analysis and subjectivity,” Handbook of natural language processing, Volume 2, 2010, pp. 627-666.
  2. Liu, Bing, “Web data mining: exploring hyperlinks, contents, and usage data,” Springer Science & Business Media, 2007.
  3. Liu, Bing, “Sentiment analysis and opinion mining,” Synthesis Lectures on Human Language Technologies, Volume 5, no. 1, 2012, pp. 1-167.
  4. Wiebe, Janyce M., Rebecca F. Bruce, Thomas P. O'Hara, “Development and use of a gold-standard data set for subjectivity classifications,” In Proceedings of the 37th annual meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics on Computational Linguistics, 1999, pp. 246-253.
  5. Arjun Chaudhuri, “Emotion and reason in consumer behavior,” Routledge, 2006.
  6. Morariu, I. Daniel, Cretulesku G Radu, Breazu Macarie, Feature selection in document classification.
  7. Zia, Tehseen, Qaiser Abbas, Muhammad Pervez Akhtar, “Evaluation of Feature Selection Approaches for Urdu Text Categorization,” International Journal for Intelligent Systems and Applications, 2015.
  8. Meesad, Phayung, Pudsadee Boonrawd, Vatinee Nuipian, “A chi-square-test for word importance differentiation in text classification,” In Proceedings of International Conference on Information and Electronics Engineering, 2011, pp. 110-114.
  9. Debole, Franca, Fabrizio Sebastiani. “Supervised term weighting for automated text categorization,” Text mining and its applications, Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2004, pp. 81-97.
  10. Ikonomakis, M., S. Kotsiantis, V. Tampakas, “Text classification using machine learning techniques,” WSEAS Transactions on Computers, Volume 4, no. 8, 2005, pp. 966-974.
  11. Karegowda, Asha Gowda, A. S. Manjunath, M. A. Jayaram, “Comparative study of attribute selection using gain ratio and correlation based feature selection,” International Journal of Information Technology and Knowledge Management 2, 2010, no. 2, pp. 271-277.
  12. Novovičová, Jana, Antonin Malik, “Information-theoretic feature selection algorithms for text classification,” in Proceeding of IEEE International Joint Conference on Neural Networks, 2005, Vol. 5, pp. 3272-3277.
  13. N. Nicolosi, “Feature selection methods for text classification,” http://​www.​cs.​rit.​edu/​~nan2563/​feature_​ selection.pdf, 2008.
  14. S. R. Singh, H. A. Murthy, T. A. Gonsalves, “Feature selection for text classification based on gini coefficient of inequality,” Journal of Machine Learning Research - Proceedings Track, vol. 10, 2010, pp. 76-85.
  15. Changxing Shang, Min Li, Shengzhong Feng, Qingshan Jiang, Jianping Fan, “Feature selection via maximizing global information gain for text classification,” Know.-Based Syst. 54 (December 2013), pp. 298-309.
  16. Yiming Yang, Jan O. Pedersen, “A Comparative Study on Feature Selection in Text Categorization,” In Proceedings of the Fourteenth International Conference on Machine Learning (ICML 1997), Douglas H. Fisher (Ed.). Morgan Kaufmann Publishers Inc., San Francisco, CA, USA, pp. 412-420.
  17. Jana Novovičová and Antonín Malík and Pavel Pudil, “Feature Selection using Improved Mutual Information for Text Classification”, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Springer, 2004, pp. 1010-1017.
  18. Monica Rogati and Yiming Yang, “High-performing feature selection for text classification. In Proceedings of the eleventh international conference on Information and knowledge management (CIKM 2002). ACM, New York, NY, USA, pp. 659-661.
  19. Leena H. Patil, Atique Mohammad, “A multistage feature selection model for document classification using information gain and rough set,” International Journal of Advanced Research in Artificial Intelligence(IJARAI), Volume 3 Issue 11, 2014.
  20. Zhaohui Zheng, Xiaoyun Wu, and Rohini Srihari, “Feature selection for text categorization on imbalanced data,” SIGKDD Explor. Newsl. 6, 1 (June 2004), pp. 80-89.
Index Terms

Computer Science
Information Sciences


Sentiment analysis framework Opinion mining Text analytics Natural language processing.