CFP last date
01 May 2024
Call for Paper
June Edition
CAE solicits high quality original research papers for the upcoming June edition of the journal. The last date of research paper submission is 01 May 2024

Submit your paper
Know more
Reseach Article

Evaluating IP, MPLS and MPLS RSVP-TE Networks

by Oyeleke G. Akinsipe, Oluwatosin O. Akinsipe
Communications on Applied Electronics
Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA
Volume 3 - Number 1
Year of Publication: 2015
Authors: Oyeleke G. Akinsipe, Oluwatosin O. Akinsipe
10.5120/cae2015651865

Oyeleke G. Akinsipe, Oluwatosin O. Akinsipe . Evaluating IP, MPLS and MPLS RSVP-TE Networks. Communications on Applied Electronics. 3, 1 ( October 2015), 28-31. DOI=10.5120/cae2015651865

@article{ 10.5120/cae2015651865,
author = { Oyeleke G. Akinsipe, Oluwatosin O. Akinsipe },
title = { Evaluating IP, MPLS and MPLS RSVP-TE Networks },
journal = { Communications on Applied Electronics },
issue_date = { October 2015 },
volume = { 3 },
number = { 1 },
month = { October },
year = { 2015 },
issn = { 2394-4714 },
pages = { 28-31 },
numpages = {9},
url = { https://www.caeaccess.org/archives/volume3/number1/433-2015651865/ },
doi = { 10.5120/cae2015651865 },
publisher = {Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA},
address = {New York, USA}
}
%0 Journal Article
%1 2023-09-04T19:43:48.438836+05:30
%A Oyeleke G. Akinsipe
%A Oluwatosin O. Akinsipe
%T Evaluating IP, MPLS and MPLS RSVP-TE Networks
%J Communications on Applied Electronics
%@ 2394-4714
%V 3
%N 1
%P 28-31
%D 2015
%I Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA
Abstract

The basic components of a network can be used in its enhancements through the provision of some reliable services. In order to achieve these provisions of reliable services, various technologies have been put in place. One of these technologies is MPLS and it provides Quality of Service and this is done by delivering such services with high transmission speed, low delays and low losses. Due to the ability to implement Traffic Engineering in MPLS, it can be used to efficiently implement real-time applications. Signaling protocols such as RSVP-TE and CR-LDP are used for Traffic Engineering in MPLS. In this paper, the modeling of IP, MPLS and MPLS RSVP-TE (with path reserved for voice traffic) networks are presented and the performance parameters of the networks are compared. OPNET modeler 16.0 is used to simulate all the networks and the comparison is made for parameters such as Voice packet delay variation, Video packet end-to-end delay variation and voice packet reception rate.

References
  1. O. Akinsipe et al. “Comparison of IP, MPLS and MPLS RSVP-TE Networks Using OPNET,” International Journal of Computer Applications (IJCA), vol. 58, Nov. 2012, pp. 1-3.
  2. M. A. Rahman et al. “Performance Analysis of MPLS Protocols over Conventional Network,” Microwave Conf., China-Japan Joint, Shanghai, Sept. 2008, pp. 763-766.
  3. J. Barakovic et al. “Multimedia Traffic Analysis of MPLS and non-MPLS Network,” Multimedia Signal Processing and Communications, 48th Int. Symp. ELMAR-2006, Zadar, Jun. 2006, pp. 285-288.
  4. R. S. Naoum and M. Maswady, “Performance evaluation for VOIP over IP and MPLS,” World of Computer Science and Information Technology Journal (WCSIT), vol. 2, pp. 110-114, 2012.
  5. N. F. Mir and A. Chien, “Simulation of Voice over MPLS communications Networks,” IEEE ICSS conf., CA, 2002, pp. 389-393.
  6. L. He and P. Botham, “Pure MPLS Technology,” in Proc. 3rd International Conf. Availability, Reliability and Security, Barcelona, 2008, pp. 253-259.
  7. X. Xiao et al. “Traffic Engineering with MPLS in the Internet” Global Center Inc. and Michigan State University, USA, vol. 14, pp. 28-33, Mar. 2000.
  8. A. Ghanwani et al. “Traffic Engineering Standards in IP Networks Using MPLS” IEEE Communication Mag. Dec. 1999.
  9. H.M. Asif and M. G. Kaosar, “Performance Comparison of IP, ATM and MPLS Based Network Cores Using OPNET,” in 1st IEEE Int. Conf. Industrial and Information Systems, Sri Lanka, Aug. 2006.
  10. C. Metz, “RSVP: general-purpose signaling for IP,” Cisco Syst., USA, vol. 3, pp. 95-99, May/Jun. 1999.
  11. M.K. Porwal et al. “Traffic Analysis of MPLS and Non MPLS Network including MPLS Signaling Protocols and Traffic distribution in OSPF and MPLS,” Int. Conf. Emerging Trends in Engineering and Technology, ICETET, Jul. 2008.
  12. J. Lawrence, "Designing multiprotocol label switching networks", Communications Magazine, IEEE, vol. 39, pp. 134-142, Jul. 2001.
  13. A. Viswanathan, N. Feldman, Z. Wang, R. Callon, Evolution of Multiprotocol Label Switching IEEE Communications Magazine, Vol. 36, Issue 5, pp. 165-173, May. 1998.
  14. D. O. Awduche and B. Jabbori, “Internet traffic engineering using MPLS”, 2002.
  15. A. Guy, “MPLS: Multiprotocol label switching,” vol. 48, no.6, pp.20, 2006.
  16. D. E. Comer, Internetworking with TCP/IP: Principles, Protocols and Architectures. 4th Ed., Prentice Hall, pp. 750. 2000.
Index Terms

Computer Science
Information Sciences

Keywords

IP MPLS RSVP-TE TE Traffic Engineering OPNET Simulator Ulcanado