CFP last date
01 April 2024
Reseach Article

Performance Evaluation and QoS Analysis of BCDCP and CBCB Routing Protocols in Wireless Sensor Networks

by Sangeeta Vhatkar, Srishti Mehta, Mohammad Atique
Communications on Applied Electronics
Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA
Volume 3 - Number 4
Year of Publication: 2015
Authors: Sangeeta Vhatkar, Srishti Mehta, Mohammad Atique
10.5120/cae2015651948

Sangeeta Vhatkar, Srishti Mehta, Mohammad Atique . Performance Evaluation and QoS Analysis of BCDCP and CBCB Routing Protocols in Wireless Sensor Networks. Communications on Applied Electronics. 3, 4 ( November 2015), 53-58. DOI=10.5120/cae2015651948

@article{ 10.5120/cae2015651948,
author = { Sangeeta Vhatkar, Srishti Mehta, Mohammad Atique },
title = { Performance Evaluation and QoS Analysis of BCDCP and CBCB Routing Protocols in Wireless Sensor Networks },
journal = { Communications on Applied Electronics },
issue_date = { November 2015 },
volume = { 3 },
number = { 4 },
month = { November },
year = { 2015 },
issn = { 2394-4714 },
pages = { 53-58 },
numpages = {9},
url = { https://www.caeaccess.org/archives/volume3/number4/458-2015651948/ },
doi = { 10.5120/cae2015651948 },
publisher = {Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA},
address = {New York, USA}
}
%0 Journal Article
%1 2023-09-04T19:44:00.253503+05:30
%A Sangeeta Vhatkar
%A Srishti Mehta
%A Mohammad Atique
%T Performance Evaluation and QoS Analysis of BCDCP and CBCB Routing Protocols in Wireless Sensor Networks
%J Communications on Applied Electronics
%@ 2394-4714
%V 3
%N 4
%P 53-58
%D 2015
%I Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA
Abstract

A wireless sensor network (WSN) consists of low power multifunctioning sensor nodes which operate in an unattended environment with limited computational and sensing capabilities. Once deployed, the small sensor nodes are usually inaccessible to the user, and thus replacement of the energy source is not feasible. Therefore, energy efficiency is a key design issue that needs to be enhanced in order to improve the life span of the network. The sensor nodes communicate with each other via various Routing Protocols. Base-Station Controlled Dynamic Clustering Protocol (BCDCP) is a hierarchical routing protocol that distributes the energy dissipation evenly among all sensor nodes to improve network lifetime and average energy savings. To overcome the drawbacks of the BCDCP protocol, in this research a new enhanced and improved BCDCP protocol called the mobile-BCDCP (M-BCDCP) protocol has been proposed. The simulation result compares the M-BCDCP protocol with the improvised CBCB protocol and shows that M-BCDCP protocol has enhanced performance than CBCB protocol in terms of number of packets delivery, energy consumption, delay, network lifetime and throughput.

References
  1. F. Akyildiz et al., “Wireless Sensor Networks: A Survey,” Elsevier Sci. B.V. Comp. Networks, vol. 38, no. 4, Mar. 2002, pp. 393–422.
  2. W.Heinzelman, "Application Specific Protocol Architecture for Wireless Sensor Network", PhD Thesis, Massachusetts institute of technology, June 2000
  3. J. Al-Karaki, and A. Kamal, “Routing Techniques in Wireless Sensor Networks: A Survey”, IEEE Communications Magazine, vol. 11, no. 6, pp. 6-28, Dec. 2004
  4. I.F. Akyildiz, W. Su, Y. Sankarasubramaniam, and E. Cayirci, “Wireless Sensor Network: A Survey” Computer Networks, pp. 393– 22, March 2002.
  5. F. Akyildiz, W. Su, Y. Sankarasubramaniam, and E. Cayirci, “A Survey on Sensor Networks,” IEEE Communications Magazine, Aug. 2002
  6. S. Singh, M. Singh, D. Singh, “A Survey of Energy-Efficient Hierarchical Cluster-Based Routing in Wireless Sensor Networks”, International Journal of Advanced Networking and Applications Volume: 02, Pages: 570-580, 2010
  7. W. R. Heinzelman, A. Chandrakasan, and H. Balakrishnan, "Energy Efficient Communication Protocol for Wireless Microsensor Networks", in IEEE Computer Society Proceedings of the Thirty Third Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS ’00), Washington DC, USA, vol. 8, pp. 8020, Jan. 2000
  8. S. Lindsey and C. S. Raghavendra, “PEGASIS: Power Efficient Gathering in Sensor Information Systems,” in IEEE Aerospace Conference, March 2002.
  9. Vhatkar S. and Atique M., “Design Issues and Challenges in Hierarchical Routing Protocols for Wireless Sensor Networks,” Computational Science and Computational Intelligence (CSCI), 2014 International Conference on 10-13 March 2014, Las Vegas, NV, IEEE, March 2014, vol. 1, pp. 90-95
  10. Siva D. Muruganathan, Daniel C. F. MA, Rolly I. Bhasinand Abraham O. Fapojuwo, “A Centralized Energy-Efficient Routing Protocol for Wireless Sensor Networks”, Communications Magazine, IEEE, vol.43,no. 3, pp. 8–13, March 2005.
  11. S. Lindsey, C. Raghavendra, and K. M. Sivalingam, “Data Gathering Algorithms in Sensor Networks using Energy Metrics,” IEEE Trans. Parallel and Distrib. Sys., vol. 13, no. 9, Sept. 2002, pp. 924–35.
  12. Sara Abd EL Aziz, Haitham S. Hamza, Imane A. Saroit, “An Energy-Efficient Hierarchical Routing Protocol for Wireless Sensor Networks”, Informatics and Systems (INFOS), 2010 The 7th International Conference on 28 – 30 March 2010, Cairo, IEEE, pp. 1 – 7.
  13. Guangyan Huang, Xiaowei Li and Jing He, “Dynamic Minimal Spanning Tree Routing Protocol for Large Wireless Sensor Networks,” Industrial Electronics and Applications, 2006 1ST IEEE Conference on 24-26 May 2006, Singapore, IEEE Conference Publications, May 2006, pp. 1-5
  14. Bansal, T., Ghanshani, P., Joshi, R.C., “An Application Dependent Communication Protocol for Wireless Sensor Networks,” Networking, International Conference on Systems and International Conference on Mobile Communications and Learning Technologies, 2006. ICN/ICONS/MCL 2006. International Conference on 23-29 April 2006, IEEE Conference Publications, April 2006, pp. 120
  15. Krishna B B, A.S Raghuvanshi, “Centralized Border Node based Cluster Balancing Protocol for Wireless Sensor Networks ,” Contemporary Computing (IC3), 2013 Sixth International Conference on 8-10 Aug. 2013 , Noida, IEEE Conference Publications, pp. 35-40, Aug. 2013
  16. Nurhayati,“Inner Cluster Routing Protocol Wireless Sensor Network,” Computer and Communication Engineering (ICCCE), 2012 International Conference on 3-5 July 2012, Kuala Lampur, IEEE, July 2012, pp. 894-898
  17. Tarannum, S Srividya, Asha D.S. , Padmini R., Nalini L., Venugopal K.R. and Patnaik L.M. “Dynamic Hierarchical Communication Paradigm for Wireless Sensor Networks: A Centralized, Energy Efficient Approach,” Communication Systems, 2008. ICCS 2008. 11th IEEE Singapore International Conference on 19-21 Nov. 2008, Guangzhou, IEEE Conference Publications, Nov. 2008, pp. 959-963
  18. Abd El Hamid S.A. ,Hamza H.S., Saroit I.A. “Alleviating the Domino Effect in Wireless Sensor Networks,” Local Computer Networks (LCN), 2013 IEEE 38th Conference on 21-24 Oct. 2013, Sydney, NSW, IEEE, Oct. 2013, pp. 256-259
  19. Srishti Mehta, Sangeeta Vhatkar and Mohommad Atique, “Comparative Study of BCDCP Protocols in Wireless Sensor Network,” in International Journal of Computer Applications (IJCA) Proceeding on International Conference and Workshop on Emerging Trends in Technology (ICWET 2015), pp. 7-12, May 2015.
Index Terms

Computer Science
Information Sciences

Keywords

WSN hierarchical routing protocols M-BCDCP QoS CBCB energy consumption delay packet delivery ratio throughput network lifetime