Call for Paper

CAE solicits original research papers for the April 2023 Edition. Last date of manuscript submission is March 31, 2023.

Read More

Comparative Analysis of Coverage Schemes in WSN

SocButtons v1.5

Vedang Ratan Vatsa, Ankit Punia, Shruti Vatsa. Published in Information Sciences.

Comparative Analysis of Coverage Schemes in WSN
Communications on Applied Electronics
Year of Publication: 2016
Publisher: Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA
Series: Volume 5 Number 3
Authors: Vedang Ratan Vatsa, Ankit Punia, Shruti Vatsa
10.5120/cae2016652253
Download full text

Vedang Ratan Vatsa, Ankit Punia and Shruti Vatsa. Comparative Analysis of Coverage Schemes in WSN. Communications on Applied Electronics 5(3):18-23, June 2016. BibTeX

@article{10.5120/cae2016652253,
	author = {Vedang Ratan Vatsa and Ankit Punia and Shruti Vatsa},
	title = {Comparative Analysis of Coverage Schemes in WSN},
	journal = {Communications on Applied Electronics},
	issue_date = {June 2016},
	volume = {5},
	number = {3},
	month = {Jun},
	year = {2016},
	issn = {2394-4714},
	pages = {18-23},
	numpages = {6},
	url = {http://www.caeaccess.org/archives/volume5/number3/605-2016652253},
	doi = {10.5120/cae2016652253},
	publisher = {Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA},
	address = {New York, USA}
}

Abstract

Wireless sensor systems (WSN), one of the prevailing innovation patterns, are presently increasing noteworthy consideration from the analysts attributable to its extensive variety of utilizations identified with horticulture, observation, human services and natural checking. One of the difficulties of the remote sensor systems is that of scope while keeping availability. Scope is considered as a measure of nature of administration (QoS) in a sensor system as it decides how well every point in the district is checked and followed by sensors and how precise is the data accumulated by the hubs. In this paper, we characterize a few terms and ideas of scope issue and some essential outline contemplations in scope of WSN. We additionally give a brief rundown and examination of existing scope plans.

References

  1. Akyildiz, I. F., Su, W., Sankarasubramaniam, Y., & Cayirci, E. (2002). Wireless sensor networks: a survey. Computer networks, 38(4), 393-422.
  2. Chi-Fu, H., & Yu-Chee, T. (2005). The Coverage Problem in a Wireless Sensor Network. Mobile Networks and Applications, 10(4), 519.
  3. Fan, G., & Jin, S. (2010). Coverage problem in wireless sensor network: A survey. Journal of networks, 5(9), 1033-1040.
  4. Ghosh, A., & Das, S. K. (2006). Coverage and connectivity issues in wireless sensor networks. Mobile, wireless, and sensor networks: Technology, applications, and future directions, 221-256.
  5. Hefeeda, M., & Bagheri, M. (2007). Randomized k-coverage algorithms for dense sensor networks. Paper presented at the INFOCOM 2007. 26th IEEE International Conference on Computer Communications. IEEE.
  6. Polastre, J., Szewczyk, R., Mainwaring, A., Culler, D., & Anderson, J. (2004). Analysis of wireless sensor networks for habitat monitoring Wireless sensor networks (pp. 399-423): Springer.
  7. Wang, X., Xing, G., Zhang, Y., Lu, C., Pless, R., & Gill, C. (2003). Integrated coverage and connectivity configuration in wireless sensor networks. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the 1st international conference on Embedded networked sensor systems.
  8. Zhou, Z., Das, S., & Gupta, H. (2004). Connected k-coverage problem in sensor networks. Paper presented at the Computer Communications and Networks, 2004. ICCCN 2004. Proceedings. 13th International Conference on.
  9. I.F. Akyildiz, W. Su, A power aware enhanced routing (PAER) protocol for sensor networks, Georgia Tech Technical Report, January 2002
  10. A. Bakre, B.R. Badrinath, I-TCP: indirect TCP for mobile hosts, Proceedings of the 15th International Conference on Distributed Computing Systems, Vancouver, BC, May 1995, pp. 136–143
  11. M. Bhardwaj, T. Garnett, A.P. Chandrakasan, Upper bounds on the lifetime of sensor networks, IEEE International Conference on Communications ICC'01, Helsinki, Finland, June 2001
  12. V. R. Vatsa, G. Singh (2015). A Literature review of Internet of Things (IOT), International Journal of Computer Systems, Volume 2, Issue 8, August, 2015,355-358.
  13. B.G. Celler et al., An instrumentation system for the remote monitoring of changes in functional health status of the elderly, International Conference IEEE-EMBS, New York, 1994, pp. 908–909
  14. A. Cerpa, D. Estrin, ASCENT: adaptive self-configuring sensor networks topologies, UCLA Computer Science Department Technical Report UCLA/CSDTR-01-0009, May 2001
  15. A. Cerpa, J. Elson, M. Hamilton, J. Zhao, Habitat monitoring: application driver for wireless communications technology, ACM SIGCOMM'2000, Costa Rica, April 2001
  16. J.M. Cramer, R.A. Scholtz, M.Z. Win, On the analysis of UWB communication channels, IEEE MILCOM'99, 1999, pp. 1191–1195
  17. D. Estrin, R. Govindan, J. Heidemann, S. Kumar, Next century challenges: scalable coordination in sensor networks, ACM MobiCom'99, Washington, USA, 1999, pp. 263–270

Keywords

WSN, Coverage Scheme, ASCENT, OGDC, LDAC