CFP last date
01 July 2024
Call for Paper
August Edition
CAE solicits high quality original research papers for the upcoming August edition of the journal. The last date of research paper submission is 01 July 2024

Submit your paper
Know more
Reseach Article

A Study of Bayesian Classifiers Detecting Gratuitous Email Spamming

by Garima Jain
Communications on Applied Electronics
Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA
Volume 6 - Number 2
Year of Publication: 2016
Authors: Garima Jain

Garima Jain . A Study of Bayesian Classifiers Detecting Gratuitous Email Spamming. Communications on Applied Electronics. 6, 2 ( Nov 2016), 26-30. DOI=10.5120/cae2016652434

@article{ 10.5120/cae2016652434,
author = { Garima Jain },
title = { A Study of Bayesian Classifiers Detecting Gratuitous Email Spamming },
journal = { Communications on Applied Electronics },
issue_date = { Nov 2016 },
volume = { 6 },
number = { 2 },
month = { Nov },
year = { 2016 },
issn = { 2394-4714 },
pages = { 26-30 },
numpages = {9},
url = { },
doi = { 10.5120/cae2016652434 },
publisher = {Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA},
address = {New York, USA}
%0 Journal Article
%1 2023-09-04T19:56:04.193797+05:30
%A Garima Jain
%T A Study of Bayesian Classifiers Detecting Gratuitous Email Spamming
%J Communications on Applied Electronics
%@ 2394-4714
%V 6
%N 2
%P 26-30
%D 2016
%I Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA

Email turns into the real wellspring of correspondence nowadays. Most people on the earth utilize email for their own or expert utilize. Email is a successful, quicker and less expensive method for correspondence. The significance and use for the email is developing step by step. It gives an approach to effortlessly exchange data universally with the assistance of web. Because of it the email spamming is expanding step by step. As indicated by the examination, it is accounted for that a client gets more spam or insignificant sends than ham or pertinent sends. Spam is undesirable, garbage, spontaneous mass message which is accustomed to spreading infection, Trojans, noxious code, notice or to pick up benefit on irrelevant cost. Spam is a noteworthy issue that assaults the presence of electronic sends. Along these lines, it is vital to recognize ham messages from spam messages, numerous techniques have been proposed for arrangement of email as spam or ham messages. Spam channels are the projects which recognize undesirable, spontaneous, garbage messages, for example, spam messages, and counteract them to getting to the clients inbox. The channel grouping procedures are arranged into two either in view of machine learning method or in view of non-machine learning systems. Machine learning methods, for example, Naïve Bayes, Support Vector Machine, Ad boost, and choice tree and so forth though non-machine learning procedures, for example, dark/white rundown, marks, mail header checking and so on. in this paper we survey these procedures for arranging messages into spam or ham ,non- machine learning techniques, such as black/white list, signatures, mail header checking etc. in this paper we review these techniques for classifying emails into spam or ham.

  1. Yu, Bo and Xu, Zong-ben,”A comparative study for content-based dynamic spam classification using four machine learning algorithms”, Elsevier Knowledge-Based Systems, 2008.
  2. Almeida, Tiago A and Yamakami, Akebo,”Content-based spam filtering”, IEEE Neural Networks (IJCNN), International Joint Conference, pp.1-7,jul,2010.
  3. Firte, Loredana and Lemnaru, Camelia and Potolea, Rodica,” Spam detection filter using KNN algorithm and resampling ”,IEEE, 6th International Conference on Intelligent Computer Communication and Processing ,pp.27—33,Romania, Aug. 26-28, 2010.
  4. Rasim, MA and Ramiz, MA and Saadat, AN,” Classification of Textual E-mail spam using Data Mining Techniques”, the Journal of Applied Computational Intelligence and Soft Computing, JAN 2011.
  5. Rushdi Shams and Robert E. Mercer, “Classification spam emails using text and readability features,” IEEE 13th International Conference on Data Mining, 2013.
  6. Anirudh Harisinghaney, Aman Dixit, Saurabh Gupta, and Anuja Arora , “Text and image based spam email classification using KNN, Naïve Bayes and reverse DBSCAN Algorithm, ” ICROIT 2014, India, Feb 6-8 2014.
  7. Masurah Mohamad and Ali Selamat, “An evaluation on the efficiency of hybrid feature selection in spam email classification,” IEEE International Conference on Computer Communication, and Control Technology (14CT 2015), April. 2015.
  8. Izzat Alsmadi and Ikdam Alhami, “Clustering and Classification of email contents,” Journal of King Saud University-Computer and Information Sciences, vol. 27, pp. 46-57, Jan. 2015.
  9. Ms.D.Karthika Renuka, Dr.T.Hamsapriya, Mr.M.Raja Chakkaravarthi, Ms.P.Lakshmisurya, “Spam Classification based on Supervised Learning using Machine Learning Techniques,” IEEE, 2011.
  10. Megha Rathi and Vikas Pareek, “Spam Email Detection through Data Mining-A Comparative Performance Analysis,” I.J. Modern Education and Computer Science, vol. 12, pp. 31-39, 2013.
  11. Savita Pundalik Teli and Santosh Kumar Biradar, “Effective Email Classification for Spam and Non-spam,” International Journal of Advanced Research in Computer and software Engineering, vol. 4, June 6, 2014.
  12. Rekha and Sandeep Negi, “A Review on Different Spam Detection Approaches,” International Journal of Engineering Trends and Technology (IJETT), Vol. 1, May 6, 2014.
Index Terms

Computer Science
Information Sciences


Ham Spam Spamming Spam Filter Email Spam Classifier