Call for Paper

CAE solicits original research papers for the July 2021 Edition. Last date of manuscript submission is June 30, 2021.

Read More

Survey of Prisoner’s Dilemma

Meri Algarni. Published in Information Sciences.

Communications on Applied Electronics
Year of Publication: 2017
Publisher: Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA
Authors: Meri Algarni

Meri Algarni. Survey of Prisoner’s Dilemma. Communications on Applied Electronics 7(1):6-10, May 2017. BibTeX

	author = {Meri Algarni},
	title = {Survey of Prisoner’s Dilemma},
	journal = {Communications on Applied Electronics},
	issue_date = {May 2017},
	volume = {7},
	number = {1},
	month = {May},
	year = {2017},
	issn = {2394-4714},
	pages = {6-10},
	numpages = {5},
	url = {},
	doi = {10.5120/cae2017652581},
	publisher = {Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA},
	address = {New York, USA}


The Prisoner’s Dilemma (PD) is the best-known session of the method in human science. It helps us understand what supervises the amicability among joint effort and contention in business, in legislative issues, and in social settings. Preoccupation theory is routinely displayed in school classes with respects to a prisoner's trouble perspective, which demonstrates the conflict between inspiring human strengths to work together Furthermore, special driving forces to slip off. This paper displays and to a great degree clear card entertainment that adequately incorporates a large number of understudies in a Prisoner's Situation. The level of investment is impacted by the result catalysts and by a method for the reiterated association.


  1. Milovsky, Nicholas. The Basics of Game Theory and Associated Games. Retrieved 11 February 2014.
  2. Fehr, Ernst; Fischbacher, Urs (Oct 23, 2003). The Nature of human altruism.Nature Publishing Group. 425(6960): 785–791
  3. Tversky, Amos; Shafir, Eldar (2004). Preference, Belief, and Similarity: Selected Writings. Massachusetts Institute of Technology Press. ISBN 9780262700931. Retrieved February 27, 2013.
  4. Toh-Kong, Ahn; Ostrom, Elinor; Walker, James (Sep 5, 2002). Incorporating Motivational Heterogeneity into Game-Theoretic Models of Collective Action. Public Choice. 117 (3–4). Retrieved June 27, 2015.
  5. Oosterbeek, Hessel; Sloof, Randolph; Van de Kuilen, Gus (Dec 3, 2003). Cultural Differences in Ultimatum Game Experiments: Evidence from a Meta-Analysis. Experimental Economics. Springer Science and Business Media B.V. 7 (2): 171–188. doi:10.1023/B: EXEC.0000026978.14316.74. Retrieved February 27, 2013.
  6. Capraro, V (2013). A Model of Human Cooperation in Social Dilemmas. PLoS ONE. 8 (8): e72427. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0072427.
  7. Kaznatcheev, Artem (March 2, 2015). A short history of iterated prisoner's dilemma tournaments. Theory, Evolution, and Games Group. Retrieved February 8, 2016.
  8. Markets & Data. The Economist. 2007-09-27.
  9. Rehmeyer, Julie (2012-10-29). Game theory suggests current climate negotiations won't avert catastrophe". Science News. Society for Science & the Public.
  10. Osang and Nandy 2003.
  11. Dawkins, Richard (1976). The Selfish Gene. Oxford University Press.
  12. Ainslie, George (2001). Breakdown of Will. ISBN 0521-59694-7.
  13. Nicholson, Walter (2000). Intermediate Microeconomics" (8th ed.). Harcourt.
  14. Schneier, Bruce (2012-10-26). "Lance Armstrong and the Prisoners' Dilemma of Doping in Professional Sports | Wired Opinion." Retrieved 2012-10-29.
  15. Gokhale CS, Traulsen A. Evolutionary games in the multiverse. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 2010 Mar 23;107(12):5500.
  16. The Volokh Conspiracy " Elinor Ostrom and the Tragedy of the Commons." 2009-10-12. Retrieved 2011-12-17.


Prisoner’s Dilemma, Game Theory, and Quantum Game