Call for Paper

CAE solicits original research papers for the July 2021 Edition. Last date of manuscript submission is June 30, 2021.

Read More

Energy Efficient and Improved Network Lifetime Multipath Routing using FF-AOMDV and Dragonfly Topology

Shanti Jaiswal, Navneet Kaur. Published in Networks.

Communications on Applied Electronics
Year of Publication: 2018
Publisher: Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA
Authors: Shanti Jaiswal, Navneet Kaur
10.5120/cae2018652762

Shanti Jaiswal and Navneet Kaur. Energy Efficient and Improved Network Lifetime Multipath Routing using FF-AOMDV and Dragonfly Topology. Communications on Applied Electronics 7(15):7-14, April 2018. BibTeX

@article{10.5120/cae2018652762,
	author = {Shanti Jaiswal and Navneet Kaur},
	title = {Energy Efficient and Improved Network Lifetime Multipath Routing using FF-AOMDV and Dragonfly Topology},
	journal = {Communications on Applied Electronics},
	issue_date = {April 2018},
	volume = {7},
	number = {15},
	month = {Apr},
	year = {2018},
	issn = {2394-4714},
	pages = {7-14},
	numpages = {8},
	url = {http://www.caeaccess.org/archives/volume7/number15/807-2018652762},
	doi = {10.5120/cae2018652762},
	publisher = {Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA},
	address = {New York, USA}
}

Abstract

In Mobile Ad-hoc networks (MANETs), due to restricted power energy offering and frequent topology changes caused by node mobility, routing becomes a difficult problem. The research performed till date highlights this very specific drawback of energy consumption in MANETs and by applying the protocol named Ad-hoc on Demand Multipath Distance Vector with the Fitness function (FF-AOMDV) and Dragonfly topology we had minimized it. The fitness function is used to find the best path from the supply to the destination to reduce the energy consumption in multipath routing by using Dragonfly topology. The performance of the proposed FF-AOMDV protocol with dragonfly topology was evaluated using Network simulator Version 2 (NS-2), where the performance was compared with AOMDV and Ad-hoc on Demand Multipath Routing with Life Maximization (AOMR-LM) protocols, the two most popular protocols of this area. The comparison was done to evaluate performance metrics such as energy consumption, throughput, packet delivery ratio, end-to-end delay, network lifetime and routing overhead ratio by varying the node speed, packet size and simulation time. The results clearly demonstrate that the proposed FF-AOMDV protocol with Dragonfly topology outperformed AOMDV and AOMR-LM under majority of the network performance metrics and parameters.

References

  1. Mueen Uddin, Aqeel Taha, Raed Alsaqour and Tanzila Saba , Energy Efficient Multipath Routing Protocol for Mobile ad-hoc Network Using the Fitness Function, IEEE ACCESS, Volume 5, May 2017
  2. J. Sharma, Dhirendra Kumar, Amar Nath Patra, and Chiranjeev Kumar. "An update based energy-efficient reactive routing protocol for mobile Ad Hoc networks." International Journal of Computer Network and Information Security 5.11 (2013): 17.
  3. Tanaka, Smail Omar, et al., A multipath energy-conserving routing protocol for wireless ad hoc networks lifetime improvement, I.J. Intelligent Systems and Applications, 2016, 06, 61-69 Published Online May 2016 in MECS DOI: 10.5815/ijisa.2016.06.10
  4. Hassanali Nasehi et al., Improving Energy Efficiency In MANETs By Multi-path Routing, International Journal of Wireless & Mobile Networks (IJWMN) Vol. 5, No. 1, February 2013
  5. Chaba, Yogesh, R. B. Patel, and Rajesh Gargi. "Issues and challenges involved in multipath routing with DYMO protocol." International Journal of Information Technology and Knowledge Management 5.1 (2012): 21-25.
  6. Md Azharuddin et al., PSO-based approach for energy-efficient and energy-balanced routing and clustering in wireless sensor networks, Methodologies and Application soft computing, Vol.21 Issue 22/2017
  7. Muamer N. Mohammed, Nassir S. Kadhim and Waleed Kh. Ahmed, An Energy Efficient Multipath Routing Protocol Based On Signal Strength For Mobile Ad-hoc Network, ARPN Journal of Engineering and Applied Sciences , VOL. 11, NO. 11, JUNE 2016 ISSN 1819-6608
  8. Taha, Aqeel, et al. "Energy efficient multipath routing protocol for mobile ad-hoc network using the fitness function." IEEE Access 5 (2017): 10369-10381.
  9. Azharuddin, Md, and Prasanta K. Jana. "PSO-based approach for energy-efficient and energy-balanced routing and clustering in wireless sensor networks." Soft Computing 21.22 (2017): 6825-6839.
  10. Devi, V. Sowmya, and Nagaratna P. Hegde. "Energy efficient multipath routing protocol for enhancing QoS and QoE in multimedia applications for MANETs." International Journal of Communication Networks and Information Security 8.3 (2016): 158.
  11. C.Hema, Sharmila Sankar and Sandhya, Energy Efficient Cluster based Protocol to Extend the RFID Network Lifetime using Dragonfly Algorithm, International Conference on Communication and Signal Processing, April 6-8, 2016
  12. Jayavenkatesan, Rangaraj, and Anitha Mariappan. "ENERGY EFFICIENT MULTIPATH ROUTING FOR MANET BASED ON HYBRID ACO-FDRPSO."
  13. Ashrafuddin, Md, Md Manowarul Islam, and Md Mamun-or-Rashid. "Energy efficient fitness based routing protocol for underwater sensor network." International Journal of Intelligent Systems and Applications 5.6 (2013): 61.
  14. Jahanbakhsh Gudakahriz, Sajjad, Shahram Jamali, and Mina Vajed Khiavi. "Energy efficient routing in mobile ad hoc networks by using honey bee mating optimization." Journal of advances in computer research 3.4 (2012): 77-87.
  15. Sajjad Jahanbakhsh Gudakahriz et al., Energy Efficient Routing in Mobile Ad Hoc Networks by Using Honey Bee Mating Optimization, Journal of Applied Research and Technology ISSN: 1665-6423 vol. 11, N0. 6, December 2013
  16. Chen, H. H., Li, G. Q., & Liao, H. L. (2009, August). A self-adaptive improved particle swarm optimization algorithm and its application in available transfer capability calculation. In 2009 Fifth International Conference on Natural Computation (Vol. 3, pp. 200-205). IEEE
  17. Trelea, I. C. 2003. The particle swarm optimization algorithm: convergence analysis and parameter selection. Information processing letters 85(6): 317-325.
  18. Hiremath, P. S., & Joshi, S. M. (2012). Energy efficient routing protocol with adaptive fuzzy threshold energy for MANETs. International Journal of Computer Networks and Wireless Communications (IJCNWC), ISSN: 2250-3501 Vol, 2.
  19. De Rango, F., Guerriero, F., & Fazio, P. (2012). Link-stability and energy aware routing protocol in distributed wireless networks. Parallel and Distributed Systems, IEEE Transactions on, 23(4), 713-726.
  20. Manickavelu, D., & Vaidyanathan, R. U. (2014). Particle swarm optimization (PSO)-based node and link lifetime prediction algorithm for route recovery in MANET. EURASIP Journal on Wireless Communications and Networking, 2014 (1), 1-10.
  21. Mueller, S., Tsang, R. P., & Ghosal, D. (2004). Multipath routing in mobile ad hoc networks: Issues and challenges. In Performance tools and applications to networked systems (pp. 209-234). Springer Berlin Heidelberg.
  22. Balaji, V., & Duraisamy, V. (2011). Varying Overhead Ad Hoc on Demand Vector Routing in Highly Mobile Ad Hoc Network. Journal of Computer Science, 7(5), pp. 678-682
  23. Giordano, S. (2002). Mobile ad hoc networks. Handbook of wireless networks and mobile computing, 325-346.
  24. Zheng, S., Weiqiang, W. U., & Zhang, Q. (2011). Energy and link-state based routing protocol for MANET. IEICE TRANSACTIONS on Information and Systems, 94(5), 1026-1034.
  25. Marina, M. K., & Das, S. R. (2006). Ad hoc on‐demand multipath distance vector routing. Wireless communications and mobile computing, 6(7), 956 Spector, A. Z. 1989. Achieving application requirements. In Distributed Systems, S. Mullender.

Keywords

Energy efficient protocol, Mobile Ad-hoc network, multipath routing, fitness function, and Dragonfly topology