CFP last date
01 January 2024
Reseach Article

Performance Comparison based on Open Shortest Path First (OSPF) Routing Algorithm for IP Internet Networks

by Ida Nurhaida, Desi Ramayanti, Imay Nur Islamiyah
Communications on Applied Electronics
Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA
Volume 7 - Number 31
Year of Publication: 2019
Authors: Ida Nurhaida, Desi Ramayanti, Imay Nur Islamiyah

Ida Nurhaida, Desi Ramayanti, Imay Nur Islamiyah . Performance Comparison based on Open Shortest Path First (OSPF) Routing Algorithm for IP Internet Networks. Communications on Applied Electronics. 7, 31 ( Sep 2019), 12-25. DOI=10.5120/cae2019652838

@article{ 10.5120/cae2019652838,
author = { Ida Nurhaida, Desi Ramayanti, Imay Nur Islamiyah },
title = { Performance Comparison based on Open Shortest Path First (OSPF) Routing Algorithm for IP Internet Networks },
journal = { Communications on Applied Electronics },
issue_date = { Sep 2019 },
volume = { 7 },
number = { 31 },
month = { Sep },
year = { 2019 },
issn = { 2394-4714 },
pages = { 12-25 },
numpages = {9},
url = { },
doi = { 10.5120/cae2019652838 },
publisher = {Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA},
address = {New York, USA}
%0 Journal Article
%1 2023-09-04T20:02:37.266256+05:30
%A Ida Nurhaida
%A Desi Ramayanti
%A Imay Nur Islamiyah
%T Performance Comparison based on Open Shortest Path First (OSPF) Routing Algorithm for IP Internet Networks
%J Communications on Applied Electronics
%@ 2394-4714
%V 7
%N 31
%P 12-25
%D 2019
%I Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA

Due to the rapid development of technology, the higher demands of internet network users who want a form of network that can provide maximum results are increasing. In this case, Routing is one of the critical components of the network infrastructure on the Internet today, but routing performance on the router will increasingly burden the performance of the router. Consequently, it needs the addition of network scenario or management for backbone that has been built. In this case, the performance is compared to the addition of VLAN management scenarios on OSPF and combination of OSPF with VPLS Management over MPLS. The VLAN management on OSPF has the best performance, which gets throughput value up to 59.6%, packet loss up to 0.32%, jitter and delays 4.44 ms respectively.

  1. C. S. Parker, “Understanding Computers : Introductory.” [Online]. Available: [Accessed: 23-Mar-2018].
  2. APJII, “Penetration and behaviour of internet users.” [Online]. Available: [Accessed: 23-Mar-2018].
  3. I. Nurhaida, D. Ramayanti, and R. Riesaputra, “DIGITAL SIGNATURE & ENCRYPTION IMPLEMENTATION FOR INCREASING AUTHENTICATION, INTEGRITY, SECURITY AND DATA NON-REPUDIATION,” Int. Res. J. Comput. Sci., vol. 4, no. 11, pp. 4–14, 2017.
  4. H. Kim and N. Feamster, “Improving Network Management with Software Defined Networking,” IEEE Commun. Mag., no. February, pp. 114–119, 2013.
  5. Y. Chang, H. Tang, B. Li, and X. Yuan, “Distributed Joint Optimization Routing Algorithm Based on the Analytic Hierarchy Process for Wireless Sensor Networks,” IEEE Commun. Lett., vol. 21, no. 12, pp. 2718–2721, 2017.
  6. L. Wang and A. K. M. M. Hoque, “OSPFN : An OSPF Based Routing Protocol for Named Data Networking,” Named Data Networking, pp. 1–15, 2012.
  7. B. Rathi and E. F. Singh, “Performance Analysis of Distance Vector and Link State Routing Protocols,” Int. J. Comput. Sci. Trends Technol., vol. 3, no. 4, pp. 23–32, 2015.
  8. A. Irmawati1, M. T. Indrarini Dyah Irawati, S.T., and M. T. Yuli Sun Hariyani, S.T., “IMPLEMENTATION OF OSPF ROUTING PROTOCOL FOR SOFTWARE DEFINED NETWORK BASE ON ROUTEFLOW,” e-Proceeding Appl. Sci., vol. 3, no. Agustus, 2017.
  9. A. Wahab, F. A. Mustika, R. B. Bahawere, D. Setiawan, and M. Alaydrus, “Energy Efficiency and Loss of Transmission Data on Wireless Sensor Network with Obstacle,” IEEE, 106AD.
  10. T. College, “Exploration and Practice for Virtual Local Area Network ( VLAN ) Technology Lianfeng Zhao,” Appl. Mech. Mater., vol. 244, pp. 2299–2302, 2013.
  11. Cisco, “Cisco Series Switch.” [Online]. Available: [Accessed: 11-Mar-2018].
  12. D. A. J. Al-khaffaf, “Improving LAN Performance Based on IEEE802 . 1Q VLAN Switching Techniques,” J. Univ. Babylon, no. 1, pp. 286–297, 2018.
  13. A. Iqbal, S. Benoit, and U. Dar, “Considerations in Designing DCI ( Data Centre Interconnect ) in Full Mesh VPLS / Multicast Enable WAN over OTV Tunnel,” Int. J. Comput. Commun. Eng., vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 127–136, 2017.
  14. Mikrotik, “Documentation Manual TOC Mikrotik.” [Online]. Available: [Accessed: 11-Mar-2018].
  15. T. Regula and M. A. Hussain, “Multi-level Structured Tree based Routing for Energy Efficiency in WSN,” Int. J. Eng. Technol., vol. 7, pp. 5–9, 2018.
  16. F. Lu, J. Li, S. Jiang, Y. Song, and F. Wang, “Geographic Information and Node Selfish-Based Routing Algorithm for Delay Tolerant Networks,” TSINGHUASCIENCEANDTECHNOLOGY, vol. 22, no. 3, pp. 243–253, 2017.
  17. S. Dehghan and A. M. Rahmani, “A new intelligent link state routing algorithm based on Credit Base-CMAC neural network,” Int. Conf. Commun. Technol. Proceedings, ICCT, pp. 1109–1112, 2010.
  18. A. Felner, “Position Paper : Dijkstra ’ s Algorithm versus Uniform Cost Search or a Case Against Dijkstra ’ s Algorithm,” Symp. Comb. Search, pp. 47–51, 2011.
  19. Z. Yaojun, L. Hao, and R. Feng, “Applied Study of Layer 3 Switching Configuration Based on VLAN Among Colleges ’ Library Network Systems,” IEEE, 2011.
  20. L. Dian, D. Saputra, W. Sulistyo, U. Kristen, and S. Wacana, “ANALISIS QOS DIFFERENTIATED SERVICE PADA JARINGAN MPLS,” J. Teknol. Inf. dan Ilmu Komput., vol. 4, no. 4, pp. 227–236, 2017.
  21. A. U. B. Whiter and Jusak, “Implementasi VPLS pada Jaringan MPLS Berbasis Mikrotik,” J. Control Netw. Syst., vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 1–8, 2015.
  22. D. A. I. Huijun, Q. U. Hua, and Z. Jihong, “QoS Routing Algorithm with Multi-Dimensions for Overlay Networks,” China Commun., pp. 167–176, 2013.
  23. O. A. Umeh, K. A. Akpado, G. N. Okechukwu, and H. C. Ejiofor, “Throughput and Delay Analysis in a Real Time Network,” Int. J. Eng. Appl. Sci., no. 12, pp. 27–34, 2015.
  24. A. Nindya, W. Wardhana, M. Yamin, and L. M. F. Aksara, “ANALISIS QUALITY of SERVICE (QoS) JARINGAN INTERNET BERBASIS WIRELESS LAN PADA LAYANAN INDIHOME,” semanTIK, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 49–58, 2017.
  25. A. R. Sudiyatmoko, S. N. Hertiana, and R. M. Negara, “Analisis Performansi Perutingan Link State Menggunakan Algoritma Djikstra Pada Platform Software Defined Network ( SDN ),” J. Infotel, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 40–46, 2016.
  26. J. W. Guck, A. Van Bemten, M. Reisslein, W. Kellerer, and S. Member, “Unicast QoS Routing Algorithms for SDN : A Comprehensive Survey and Performance Evaluation,” IEEE Commun. Surv. TUTORIALS, vol. 20, no. 1, pp. 388–415, 2018.
  27. S. Budiyanto and A. S. Prasetyo, “STUDI ANALISIS PERFORMANSI PROTOKOL ROUTING IS-IS DAN OSPFv3 PADA IPv6 UNTUK LAYANAN VIDEO STREAMING,” J. Teknol. Elektro, Univ. Mercu Buana, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 18–32, 2014
Index Terms

Computer Science
Information Sciences