CFP last date
01 May 2024
Reseach Article

Generic Approach for Goal Driven Software Requirement Risk Management

by Shruti Patil, Roshani Ade
Communications on Applied Electronics
Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA
Volume 1 - Number 3
Year of Publication: 2015
Authors: Shruti Patil, Roshani Ade

Shruti Patil, Roshani Ade . Generic Approach for Goal Driven Software Requirement Risk Management. Communications on Applied Electronics. 1, 3 ( February 2015), 18-21. DOI=10.5120/cae-1527

@article{ 10.5120/cae-1527,
author = { Shruti Patil, Roshani Ade },
title = { Generic Approach for Goal Driven Software Requirement Risk Management },
journal = { Communications on Applied Electronics },
issue_date = { February 2015 },
volume = { 1 },
number = { 3 },
month = { February },
year = { 2015 },
issn = { 2394-4714 },
pages = { 18-21 },
numpages = {9},
url = { },
doi = { 10.5120/cae-1527 },
publisher = {Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA},
address = {New York, USA}
%0 Journal Article
%1 2023-09-04T18:37:29.587719+05:30
%A Shruti Patil
%A Roshani Ade
%T Generic Approach for Goal Driven Software Requirement Risk Management
%J Communications on Applied Electronics
%@ 2394-4714
%V 1
%N 3
%P 18-21
%D 2015
%I Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA

An analysis of many software program assignments in between 2011, as well as 2014, shows an interesting pattern. Author identified areas which may lead to project failure which are weak requirement analysis and management, weak cost calculating, weak handling of requirement change requests, weak milestone monitoring and requirement gold plating habit. By comparison, prosperous local software program assignments tended to be much better than onsite software development and management. Maybe the most interesting part of most of these many problem areas can be that each is regarding project managing instead of using technical personnel. We focused over the impact of software requirement change requests and requirement gold plating while dealing with onsite project assignments. Author also evaluated new model to avoid global software engineering requirement failure, which in turn curtails the estimated time and budget with client satisfaction. In this paper, Author discuss the ideas that support requirements reflection as a means to articulate some of the outstanding research challenges.

  1. Younis, Awad A. , Yashwant K. Malaiya, and Indrajit Ray. 2014. Using Attack Surface Entry Points and Reachability Analysis to Assess the Risk of Software Vulnerability Exploitability. IEEE 15th International Symposium on High-Assurance Systems Engineering (HASE).
  2. Islam, Shareeful, Haralambos Mouratidis, and Edgar R. Weippl. 2014. An empirical study on the implementation and evaluation of a goal-driven software development risk management model. Information and Software Technology.
  3. Babar, Muhammad Ali, and Christian Lescher. 2014. Editorial: Global software engineering: Identifying challenges is important and providing solutions is even better. Information and Software Technology
  4. Whitmore, 2014. Threat analysis in the software development lifecycle. IBM Journal of Research and Development
  5. Hibshi, Hanan, 2014. Rethinking Security Requirements in RE Research. Tech. Rep. Report CS-TR-2014-001, Univ. Texas at San Antonio. .
  6. Yang, Ming 2014. "The Measurement and Analysis of Software Engineering Risk Based on Information Entropy. " Proceedings of International Conference on Soft Computing Techniques and Engineering Application. Springer India.
  7. Creemers, Stefan, Erik Demeulemeester, and Stijn Van de Vonder. 2014. A new approach for quantitative risk analysis. Annals of Operations Research
  8. Sulaman, Sardar Muhammad, Krzysztof Wnuk, and Martin H2014. Perspective Based Risk Analysis-A Controlled Experiment. International Conference on Evaluation and Assessment in Software Engineering (EASE 2014).
  9. Ferrucci, Filomena, 2013. "Not going to take this anymore: multi-objective overtime planning for software engineering projects. " Proceedings of the 2013 International Conference on Software Engineering. IEEE Press.
  10. Hu, Yong, 2013. Software project risk analysis using Bayesian networks with causality constraints. Decision Support Systems
  11. Hu, Yong, 2013. An integrative framework for intelligent software project risk planning. Decision Support Systems
  12. Heidrich, Jens. 2013. Software E ort Estimation and Risk Management. Product-Focused Software Process Improvement. Springer Berlin Heidelberg.
  13. Wautelet, Yves, Manuel Kolp, and Stephan Poelmans. 2013. Requirements-driven iterative project planning. Software and Data Technologies. Springer Berlin Heidelberg.
  14. Hsu, Wen-Ko, 2012. Risk and uncertainty analysis in the planning stages of a risk decision-making process. Natural hazards.
  15. He, Yong-xiu, 2011. Risk assessment of urban network planning in china based on the matter-element model and extension analysis. International Journal of Systems
  16. Asnar, Yudistira, Paolo Giorgini, and John Mylopoulos. 2011. Goal-driven risk assessment in requirements engineering. Requirements Engineering.
  17. Eric, S. K. , Paolo Giorgini, and Neil Maiden, eds. 2011. Social modeling for requirements engineering. Mit Press.
  18. Zwikael, Ofer, and Mark Ahn. 2011. The effectiveness of risk management: an analysis of project risk planning across industries and countries. Risk analysis
  19. Jørgensen, Magne, and Kjetil Moløkken-Østvold. 2006. How large are software cost overruns? A review of the 1994 CHAOS report. " Information and Software Technology
  20. Shruti Patil and Roshani Ade. 2014. Software Requirement Engineering Risk Prediction Model. International Journal of Computer Applications.
  21. Shruti Patil and Roshani Ade. 2014. Secured Cloud Support For Global Software Requirement Risk Management. International Journal of Software and Application.
  22. Shruti Patil and Roshani Ade. 2014. Cloud Data Security for Goal Driven Global Software Engineering Projects. International Conference on Information and Communication Technologies (ICICT 2014) Procedia Computer Science, Elsevier.
  23. Shruti Patil and Roshani Ade. 2015. A Software Project Risk Analysis Tool Using Software Development Goal Modeling Approach. Systems Design and Intelligent Applications Proceedings of Second International Conference INDIA 2015, Information Systems Design and Intelligent Applications , Volume 2, Series: Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing , volume 340 ; Springer Verlag.
Index Terms

Computer Science
Information Sciences


Risk analysis Requirement change risk software risk Global Software Development